Posts

Special Leave To Appeal Under Articles 136 of The Constitution of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India Assailing The Impugned Order Passed By The Learned Single Judge of The High Court In Notice of Motion Filed By The Respondent In The Already Disposed Off Batch Of Bunch Suits Whereby The Learned Single Judge Has By Passing The Impugned Order Virtually Stayed Its Own Consent Order As Modified Subsequently By Consent Order In A Batch Of Bunch Suits Which Were Finally Disposed off Via Compromise Vide Consent Minutes of The Order / Amended Consent Minutes of The Order.

Image
Special Leave To Appeal Under Articles 136 of The Constitution of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India Assailing The Impugned Order Passed By The Learned Single Judge of The High Court In Notice of Motion Filed By The Respondent In The Already Disposed Off Batch Of Bunch Suits Whereby The Learned Single Judge Has By Passing The Impugned Order Virtually Stayed Its Own Consent Order As Modified Subsequently By Consent Order In A Batch Of Bunch Suits Which Were Finally Disposed off Via Compromise Vide Consent Minutes of The Order / Amended Consent Minutes of The Order . OR         NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK   MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI   KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com
Post a Comment
Read more

Special Leave Petition Under Articles 136 of The Constitution of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India Against The Impugned Order Passed By The Learned Single Judge of The High Court In Civil Revision (O&M), Whereby The Learned Single Judge Has In-Limine Dismissed The Civil Revision Petition Preferred By The Petitioner Seeking Setting Aside of The Order Passed By The Ld. Addl. District Judge And The Ld. Single Judge Passed The Impugned Order Without Deciding The Application Filed By The Petitioner Under Order 1 Rule 10 Read With Order 23 Rule 1a of The CPC Seeking Leave To Be Transposed As A Petitioner In The Civil Revision Petition.

Image
Special Leave Petition Under Articles 136 of The Constitution of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India Against The Impugned Order Passed By The Learned Single Judge of The High Court In Civil Revision (O&M), Whereby The Learned Single Judge Has In-Limine Dismissed The Civil Revision Petition Preferred By The Petitioner Seeking Setting Aside of The Order Passed By The Ld. Addl. District Judge And The Ld. Single Judge Passed The Impugned Order Without Deciding The Application Filed By The Petitioner Under Order 1 Rule 10 Read With Order 23 Rule 1a of The CPC Seeking Leave To Be Transposed As A Petitioner In The Civil Revision Petition . OR         NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK   MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI   KU...
Post a Comment
Read more

Special Leave To Appeal Under Articles 136 of The Constitution OF India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Against The Final Judgment And Order Passed By Hon’ble High Court In C.O.C.P. Whereby The Hon’ble High Court Has Dismissed The Petition of The Petitioners In Limnie And Resultantly The Hon’ble High Court Has Erred In Allowing The Litigants To Make Solemn Assurances & Statements And Give Undertakings Before The Courts Based Upon Which Orders Are Passed By The Hon’ble Courts And Later On The High Court Permitted The Litigants To Flout Those Undertakings And Orders And Instead Of Entertaining The Contempt Proceedings Against Such Litigants, The Hon’ble High Court Required The Petitioner To File Execution OF The Order of The Court Before Whom Such Undertaking Was Given By The Defaulting Party.

Image
Special Leave To Appeal Under Articles 136 of The Constitution OF India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Against The Final Judgment And Order Passed By Hon’ble High Court In C.O.C.P. Whereby The Hon’ble High Court Has Dismissed The Petition of The Petitioners In Limnie And Resultantly The Hon’ble High Court Has Erred In Allowing The Litigants To Make Solemn Assurances & Statements And Give Undertakings Before The Courts Based Upon Which Orders Are Passed By The Hon’ble Courts And Later On The High Court Permitted The Litigants To Flout Those Undertakings And Orders And Instead Of Entertaining The Contempt Proceedings Against Such Litigants, The Hon’ble High Court Required The Petitioner To File Execution OF The Order of The Court Before Whom Such Undertaking Was Given By The Defaulting Party . OR         NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai...
Post a Comment
Read more

Special Leave Petition Under Article 32 of The Constitution of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Against The Impugned Order/ Judgment Passed By The Hon’ble High Court In A C.W.P. Vide Which The Hon’ble High Court Had Dismissed The Said Writ Petition In Liminie And Resultantly The Hon’ble High Court Has Erred In Law In Not Appreciating That The Investigating Officer of The Case Had In A Malafide Manner And In An Uncanny Haste Arrived At Finding/Conclusion That The Cases Are of Civil In Nature Thereby Frustrating The Legal Rights of The Petitioners Which Is Apparent From The Fact That The Consistent Stand of The Investigating Officer Before The Different Courts Was That The Accused Had In A Pre-Planned Criminal Conspiracy Cheated The Innocent Customers of Several Cores of Rupees And In Fact The I.O. Had Stated In His Reply Filed In High Court That Custodial Investigation of The Accused Was Required To Ascertain The Truth.

Image
Special Leave Petition Under Article 32 of The Constitution of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Against The Impugned Order/ Judgment Passed By The Hon’ble High Court In A C.W.P. Vide Which The Hon’ble High Court Had Dismissed The Said Writ Petition In Liminie And Resultantly The Hon’ble High Court Has Erred In Law In Not Appreciating That The Investigating Officer of The Case Had In A Malafide Manner And In An Uncanny Haste Arrived At Finding/Conclusion That The Cases Are of Civil In Nature Thereby Frustrating The Legal Rights of The Petitioners Which Is Apparent From The Fact That The Consistent Stand of The Investigating Officer Before The Different Courts Was That The Accused Had In A Pre-Planned Criminal Conspiracy Cheated The Innocent Customers of Several Cores of Rupees And InFact The I.O. Had Stated In His Reply Filed In High Court That Custodial Investigation of The Accused Was Required To Ascertain The Truth . OR         NAME MOBILE NO...
Post a Comment
Read more

Special Leave Petition Under Article 32 of The Constitution Of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Seeking Leave To Appeal Against The Impugned Judgment And Order Passed By The Ld. Single Judge of Hon’ble High Court In C.C.P.O (Contempt Petition) Filed By The Petitioner In C.S.(OS) Whereby The Ld. Single Judge Has While Dismissing A Contempt Petition, Had Observed That “I Am Not Inclined To Deal With The Allegations Made In The Application. Hence Dismissed But The Ld. Single Judge Did Not Appreciate That The Said Observation Prima Facie Prove That Had Not Gone Into The Merits of The Case And The Dismissal of The Contempt Petition Was Actually Refusal On The Part of The Ld. Single Judge To Exercise His Jurisdiction

Image
Special Leave Petition Under Article 32 of The Constitution Of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Seeking Leave To Appeal Against The Impugned Judgment And Order Passed By The Ld. Single Judge of Hon’ble High Court In C.C.P.O (Contempt Petition) Filed By The Petitioner In C.S.(OS) Whereby The Ld. Single Judge Has While Dismissing A Contempt Petition, Had Observed That “I Am Not Inclined To Deal With The Allegations Made In The Application. Hence Dismissed But The Ld. Single Judge Did Not Appreciate That The Said Observation Prima Facie Prove That Had Not Gone Into The Merits of The Case And The Dismissal of The Contempt Petition Was Actually Refusal On The Part of The Ld. Single Judge To Exercise His Jurisdiction OR         NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutch...
Post a Comment
Read more