Special Leave Petition Under Order Xvi Rule 4(1) (A) Read With Article 32 of The Constitution of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India Assailing The Impugned Judgment And Order Passed By The Hon’ble High Court In W.P. (Pil) Whereby The Hon’ble Division Bench Has Dismissed The Petition Of The Petitioner On The Ground That This Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India Have Vide Order Passed In Wp(C) No.292 Of 2011 Declined To Refer The Investigation of “Secret Service Fund” To The Cbi For Last Ten Years On The Ground That There Is No Statuary Provision For The Same But The Hon’ble High Court Erred In Appreciating That The Said Order Of This Hon’ble Supreme Court Is In The Nature of A General Order And The Same Does Not Come In Way Of The Reliefs Prayed In The Present W.P. (PIL) As The Nature Of Allegations Made In This Petition Is Of Particular Nature And The Hon’ble High Court, Not Withstanding The Order Of The Apex Court In W.P. (C) Can Definitely Interfere Under Its Inherent Jurisdiction And / Or Even The State Government Can Interfere And Order For The Investigation Into The “Secret Service Fund” Either By The CBI And / Or By Any Other Appropriate Agency By Invoking Provision of Delhi Special Police Establishment Act 1946

Special Leave Petition Under Order Xvi Rule 4(1) (A) Read With Article 32 of The Constitution of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India Assailing The Impugned Judgment And Order Passed By The Hon’ble High Court In W.P. (Pil) Whereby The Hon’ble Division Bench Has Dismissed The Petition Of The Petitioner On The Ground That This Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India Have Vide Order Passed In Wp(C) No.292 Of 2011 Declined To Refer The Investigation of “Secret Service Fund” To The Cbi For Last Ten Years On The Ground That There Is No Statuary Provision For The Same But The Hon’ble High Court Erred In Appreciating That The Said Order Of This Hon’ble Supreme Court Is In The Nature of A General Order And The Same Does Not Come In Way Of The Reliefs Prayed In The Present W.P. (PIL) As The Nature Of Allegations Made In This Petition Is Of Particular Nature And The Hon’ble High Court, Not Withstanding The Order Of The Apex Court In W.P. (C) Can Definitely Interfere Under Its Inherent Jurisdiction And / Or Even The State Government Can Interfere And Order For The Investigation Into The “Secret Service Fund”Either By The CBI And / Or By Any Other Appropriate Agency By Invoking Provision of Delhi Special Police Establishment Act 1946


OR

 

 

 

 

NAME

MOBILE NO.

E-MAIL I’D

RANJEET KUMAR

8383098478, 9667769795

rk@courtkutchehry.com

JAI THAKUR

8130703334, 9355723300

jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com

RAJEEV RANJAN

9334553249

rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com

ASHOK MISHRA

9718327746

sales@courtkutchehry.com

RAVI KUMAR


ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Special Leave Petition Under Articles 136 of The Constitution of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India Against The Impugned Order Passed By The Learned Single Judge of The High Court In Civil Revision (O&M), Whereby The Learned Single Judge Has In-Limine Dismissed The Civil Revision Petition Preferred By The Petitioner Seeking Setting Aside of The Order Passed By The Ld. Addl. District Judge And The Ld. Single Judge Passed The Impugned Order Without Deciding The Application Filed By The Petitioner Under Order 1 Rule 10 Read With Order 23 Rule 1a of The CPC Seeking Leave To Be Transposed As A Petitioner In The Civil Revision Petition.

Image
Special Leave Petition Under Articles 136 of The Constitution of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India Against The Impugned Order Passed By The Learned Single Judge of The High Court In Civil Revision (O&M), Whereby The Learned Single Judge Has In-Limine Dismissed The Civil Revision Petition Preferred By The Petitioner Seeking Setting Aside of The Order Passed By The Ld. Addl. District Judge And The Ld. Single Judge Passed The Impugned Order Without Deciding The Application Filed By The Petitioner Under Order 1 Rule 10 Read With Order 23 Rule 1a of The CPC Seeking Leave To Be Transposed As A Petitioner In The Civil Revision Petition . OR         NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK   MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI   KU...
Read more

Special Leave To Appeal Under Articles 136 of The Constitution OF India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Against The Final Judgment And Order Passed By Hon’ble High Court In C.O.C.P. Whereby The Hon’ble High Court Has Dismissed The Petition of The Petitioners In Limnie And Resultantly The Hon’ble High Court Has Erred In Allowing The Litigants To Make Solemn Assurances & Statements And Give Undertakings Before The Courts Based Upon Which Orders Are Passed By The Hon’ble Courts And Later On The High Court Permitted The Litigants To Flout Those Undertakings And Orders And Instead Of Entertaining The Contempt Proceedings Against Such Litigants, The Hon’ble High Court Required The Petitioner To File Execution OF The Order of The Court Before Whom Such Undertaking Was Given By The Defaulting Party.

Image
Special Leave To Appeal Under Articles 136 of The Constitution OF India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Against The Final Judgment And Order Passed By Hon’ble High Court In C.O.C.P. Whereby The Hon’ble High Court Has Dismissed The Petition of The Petitioners In Limnie And Resultantly The Hon’ble High Court Has Erred In Allowing The Litigants To Make Solemn Assurances & Statements And Give Undertakings Before The Courts Based Upon Which Orders Are Passed By The Hon’ble Courts And Later On The High Court Permitted The Litigants To Flout Those Undertakings And Orders And Instead Of Entertaining The Contempt Proceedings Against Such Litigants, The Hon’ble High Court Required The Petitioner To File Execution OF The Order of The Court Before Whom Such Undertaking Was Given By The Defaulting Party . OR         NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai...
Read more

Special Leave Petition Under Article 32 of The Constitution Of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Seeking Leave To Appeal Against The Impugned Judgment And Order Passed By The Ld. Single Judge of Hon’ble High Court In C.C.P.O (Contempt Petition) Filed By The Petitioner In C.S.(OS) Whereby The Ld. Single Judge Has While Dismissing A Contempt Petition, Had Observed That “I Am Not Inclined To Deal With The Allegations Made In The Application. Hence Dismissed But The Ld. Single Judge Did Not Appreciate That The Said Observation Prima Facie Prove That Had Not Gone Into The Merits of The Case And The Dismissal of The Contempt Petition Was Actually Refusal On The Part of The Ld. Single Judge To Exercise His Jurisdiction

Image
Special Leave Petition Under Article 32 of The Constitution Of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Seeking Leave To Appeal Against The Impugned Judgment And Order Passed By The Ld. Single Judge of Hon’ble High Court In C.C.P.O (Contempt Petition) Filed By The Petitioner In C.S.(OS) Whereby The Ld. Single Judge Has While Dismissing A Contempt Petition, Had Observed That “I Am Not Inclined To Deal With The Allegations Made In The Application. Hence Dismissed But The Ld. Single Judge Did Not Appreciate That The Said Observation Prima Facie Prove That Had Not Gone Into The Merits of The Case And The Dismissal of The Contempt Petition Was Actually Refusal On The Part of The Ld. Single Judge To Exercise His Jurisdiction OR         NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutch...
Read more