Appeal Under Section 55 of The Monopolies & Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 Read With Order Xx-A of The Supreme Court Rules, 1966 To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India Against The Impugned Judgment And Final Order Passed By The Monopolies & Restrictive Trade Practices Commission In A Utpe Whereby The Hon’ble Commission Has Passed A “Cease And Desist” Order Against The Appellant And Has Directed The Appellant Not To Claim Escalation Charges For Increase In The Cost of Material And Labour Charges And Also Directed The Appellant To Refund The Same, If Already Realized And Also To Refund The Holding Charges As The Appellant Has Indulged In Unfair Trade Practices



OR

 

 

 

 

NAME

MOBILE NO.

E-MAIL I’D

RANJEET KUMAR

8383098478, 9667769795

rk@courtkutchehry.com

JAI THAKUR

8130703334, 9355723300

jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com

RAJEEV RANJAN

9334553249

rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com

ASHOK MISHRA

9718327746

sales@courtkutchehry.com

RAVI KUMAR


ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Special Leave Petition Under Articles 136 of The Constitution of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India Against The Impugned Order Passed By The Learned Single Judge of The High Court In Civil Revision (O&M), Whereby The Learned Single Judge Has In-Limine Dismissed The Civil Revision Petition Preferred By The Petitioner Seeking Setting Aside of The Order Passed By The Ld. Addl. District Judge And The Ld. Single Judge Passed The Impugned Order Without Deciding The Application Filed By The Petitioner Under Order 1 Rule 10 Read With Order 23 Rule 1a of The CPC Seeking Leave To Be Transposed As A Petitioner In The Civil Revision Petition.

Image
Special Leave Petition Under Articles 136 of The Constitution of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court Of India Against The Impugned Order Passed By The Learned Single Judge of The High Court In Civil Revision (O&M), Whereby The Learned Single Judge Has In-Limine Dismissed The Civil Revision Petition Preferred By The Petitioner Seeking Setting Aside of The Order Passed By The Ld. Addl. District Judge And The Ld. Single Judge Passed The Impugned Order Without Deciding The Application Filed By The Petitioner Under Order 1 Rule 10 Read With Order 23 Rule 1a of The CPC Seeking Leave To Be Transposed As A Petitioner In The Civil Revision Petition . OR         NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK   MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI   KU...
Read more

Special Leave To Appeal Under Articles 136 of The Constitution OF India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Against The Final Judgment And Order Passed By Hon’ble High Court In C.O.C.P. Whereby The Hon’ble High Court Has Dismissed The Petition of The Petitioners In Limnie And Resultantly The Hon’ble High Court Has Erred In Allowing The Litigants To Make Solemn Assurances & Statements And Give Undertakings Before The Courts Based Upon Which Orders Are Passed By The Hon’ble Courts And Later On The High Court Permitted The Litigants To Flout Those Undertakings And Orders And Instead Of Entertaining The Contempt Proceedings Against Such Litigants, The Hon’ble High Court Required The Petitioner To File Execution OF The Order of The Court Before Whom Such Undertaking Was Given By The Defaulting Party.

Image
Special Leave To Appeal Under Articles 136 of The Constitution OF India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Against The Final Judgment And Order Passed By Hon’ble High Court In C.O.C.P. Whereby The Hon’ble High Court Has Dismissed The Petition of The Petitioners In Limnie And Resultantly The Hon’ble High Court Has Erred In Allowing The Litigants To Make Solemn Assurances & Statements And Give Undertakings Before The Courts Based Upon Which Orders Are Passed By The Hon’ble Courts And Later On The High Court Permitted The Litigants To Flout Those Undertakings And Orders And Instead Of Entertaining The Contempt Proceedings Against Such Litigants, The Hon’ble High Court Required The Petitioner To File Execution OF The Order of The Court Before Whom Such Undertaking Was Given By The Defaulting Party . OR         NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai...
Read more

Special Leave Petition Under Article 32 of The Constitution Of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Seeking Leave To Appeal Against The Impugned Judgment And Order Passed By The Ld. Single Judge of Hon’ble High Court In C.C.P.O (Contempt Petition) Filed By The Petitioner In C.S.(OS) Whereby The Ld. Single Judge Has While Dismissing A Contempt Petition, Had Observed That “I Am Not Inclined To Deal With The Allegations Made In The Application. Hence Dismissed But The Ld. Single Judge Did Not Appreciate That The Said Observation Prima Facie Prove That Had Not Gone Into The Merits of The Case And The Dismissal of The Contempt Petition Was Actually Refusal On The Part of The Ld. Single Judge To Exercise His Jurisdiction

Image
Special Leave Petition Under Article 32 of The Constitution Of India To Be Filed Before Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Seeking Leave To Appeal Against The Impugned Judgment And Order Passed By The Ld. Single Judge of Hon’ble High Court In C.C.P.O (Contempt Petition) Filed By The Petitioner In C.S.(OS) Whereby The Ld. Single Judge Has While Dismissing A Contempt Petition, Had Observed That “I Am Not Inclined To Deal With The Allegations Made In The Application. Hence Dismissed But The Ld. Single Judge Did Not Appreciate That The Said Observation Prima Facie Prove That Had Not Gone Into The Merits of The Case And The Dismissal of The Contempt Petition Was Actually Refusal On The Part of The Ld. Single Judge To Exercise His Jurisdiction OR         NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutch...
Read more